Citation Loops

A citation loop occurs when an organisation's published findings are corroborated primarily by sources that share governance, funding, or authorship with the original publisher — creating a closed evidential circuit that amplifies a claim without adding independent support.

4 documented loops 21 reports involved 12 organizations Rubric v0.3.2

How to Read a Loop

The closed evidential circuit
01

Publisher

The report under evaluation cites outside support for a claim, count, or framing.

02

Linked source

The source shares governance, funding, authorship, data custody, or advocacy infrastructure.

03

Closed circuit

The citation is presented as independent corroboration without adding independent verification.

Inspection Map

Supporting evidence across all loops

The map groups publishers, cited sources, and governance or amplification actors into stable lanes. Hover a loop ID to isolate its relationships, or hover a node to inspect its immediate connections.

12 organizations18 documented relationships4 loop records
LOOP-001: FoundedLOOP-001: FoundedLOOP-001: FoundedLOOP-001: Cites as independent sourceLOOP-001: Cites as independent sourceLOOP-001: Cites in own reportsLOOP-002: ConductedLOOP-002: Cites as primary evidenceLOOP-002: Published by same orgLOOP-003: Submits testimony & briefingsLOOP-003: Findings cited as independent validationLOOP-003: Cites as 'US government finding'LOOP-003: Lobbied via Fidelis ($55K+)LOOP-003: Affiliated through ICNA networkLOOP-004: Co-published / cites as independent sourceLOOP-004: Cites Savera reports in own publicationsLOOP-004: Later reports cite earlier Savera reportsLOOP-004: Cites as independent sourceSavera — Publisher, 5 relationshipsSaveraPublisherCSOH — Publisher, 4 relationshipsCSOHPublisherUSCIRF — Publisher, 4 relationshipsUSCIRFPublisherEquality Labs — Publisher, 3 relationshipsEquality LabsPublisherEL 2016 Survey — Source, 3 relationshipsEL 2016 SurveySourceIndia Hate Lab — Source, 3 relationshipsIndia Hate LabSourceHindutva Watch — Source, 2 relationshipsHindutva WatchSourcePRA — Source, 2 relationshipsPRASourceHindutva Watch — Source, 1 relationshipHindutva WatchSourceShared Founder — Governance, 3 relationshipsShared FounderGovernanceIAMC — Amplifier, 4 relationshipsIAMCAmplifierJustice For All — Amplifier, 2 relationshipsJustice For AllAmplifier
Loops
RolesPublisherSourceGovernanceAmplifier
EdgesCitationGovernanceFundingAmplification
This network is generated from CITATION_LOOPS at build time, so the map remains visible before JavaScript loads.

Registry Dockets

4 records

Identification Criteria

What qualifies as a loop

A pattern enters the registry only when supported by documentary evidence: IRS 990 filings, state registrations, co-authorship records, funding relationships, or public governance disclosures.

01

Circular citation

Source A cites Source B as corroboration; Source B cites Source A. Neither provides independent evidentiary grounding.

02

Governance overlap

Two or more sources cited as independent share board members, officers, or founders established through public filings.

03

Self-citation

A report's primary quantitative claims rest on data produced by the same organisation with no independent audit or replication.

04

Funding dependence

The citing and cited organisations share a funder or grantor relationship undisclosed in the report.