Savera: United Against Supremacy
Savera
Institutional Analysis
Strong source-verification infrastructure undermined by undefined characterization criteria and a self-reinforcing citation chain across all three reports. Coalition co-authorship creates structural D5 circularity that is not disclosed.
- D6 (Verification) scores 5–6 across all reports — web.archive.org usage is the strongest archiving signal in the non-survey corpus
- D1 (Definitions) scores 3–5 — 'supremacist' used without published criteria in every report
- D8 (Counter-Evidence) scores 2–4 — no engagement with subjects' substantive responses in any report
- 3
- Reports scored
- 4.4
- Avg. score
- 2024–2024
- Years covered
Scored Reports (3)
5.4 Deficient
CID-0008 Investigation Report 2024
HAF Way to Supremacy: How the Hindu American Foundation Rebrands Bigotry as Minority Rights
CIRCULAR COALITION SOURCING
4.1 Deficient
CID-0023 Investigation Report 2024
Cut From the Same Cloth: The VHP-A's Ties to its Indian Counterpart
CIRCULAR CITATION ECOSYSTEMUNDEFINED CHARACTERIZATION
3.7 Advocacy-Grade
CID-0026 Investigation Report 2024
The Global VHP's Trail of Violence
CHARACTERIZING TERMS WITHOUT CRITERIAUNDISCLOSED CIRCULAR SOURCINGNO COUNTER EVIDENCE ENGAGEMENT